ReactJS

My first steps towards learning React

Published Oct 28, 2019

Updated Feb 14, 2023

4 min read

This article was written over 18 months ago and may contain information that is out of date. Some content may be relevant but please refer to the relevant official documentation or available resources for the latest information.

As a developer, I know I am always excited to learn the new, cool tech as soon as it comes out. Different people do it for different reasons; some do it to increase their knowledge bank, while for others it could be an add on to ease down their existing work and so on. That’s how I took my first step towards learning React.

The very initial stage for me was understanding how React was different and its benefits.

Basics of React

Create interactive UI components and React renders it for you on any data change.
It’s component based, build encapsulated components and they can manage their state.

React for beginners

What do we understand when we see the below statement.

const element = <h1>Hello, world!</h1>;

This is JSX an extension to Javascript that helps us create React Components. When we look at what our JSX code actually looks like on the execution.

const element = <h1>Hello, world!</h1>;
var appRoot = document.getElementById('app');  
ReactDOM.render(element,appRoot);

While it’s compiled it’s changed to:

var element = React.createElement("h1", null, "Hello, world!");  
var appRoot = document.getElementById('app');  
ReactDOM.render(element, appRoot);

Components, Props and State

The three main pillars of React are: components, props, and state. The entire code is built around these pillars. Elements are the smallest building blocks of React. Let’s start with creating a simple component and render the same.

import React from "react";  
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";

import "./styles.css";

function Counter() {  
  const count = 0;  
  return (  
    <div className="App">
      <h1>Counter:{count}</h1>
      <button>Increment</button>
      <button>Decrement</button>
      <button>Reset</button>
    </div>
  );
}

const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<Counter />, rootElement);

We have two types of components:

Function Component: It accepts the props and returns a React Element. We also call it a functional stateless component because, being a simple JavaScript function, it does not allow the use of useState() in the component. They just receive input as props and return output as JSX: (props) => JSX. However, React Hooks made it possible to have a state in Function Components. I'll explain this towards the end.
Class Component: It extends React.Component and creates a render function which returns a React Element.

So while we work on creating a presentational component, we must use a function component. For containers, we use class components.

React controls the data flow in the components with state and props. The data in states and props are used to render the Component with dynamic data. So the rule here says “Props go down(from parent to children) and events go up(from children to parent”).

Let’s take another example to understand props, events, and state.

import React from "react";
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";

import "./styles.css";
class Counter extends React.Component{
  constructor(props){
      super(props);
      this.handleaddOne=this.handleaddOne.bind(this);
      this.handleminusOne=this.handleminusOne.bind(this);
      this.handlereset=this.handlereset.bind(this);
      this.state={
          count:props.count
      };
  }
  handleaddOne(){
    this.setState((prevState)=>{
     return{
         count: prevState.count+1
     };
    });
 }
 handleminusOne(){  
     this.setState((prevState)=>{
     return{
         count: prevState.count-1
     };  
    });  
 }  
 handlereset(){  
    this.setState((prevState)=>  
    {  
return{  
 count:0  
};  
    });  
 }  
 render(){  
     return(  
     <div>  
       <h1>Count:{this.state.count}</h1>
       <button onClick={this.handleaddOne}>Increment</button>
       <button onClick={this.handleminusOne}>Decrement</button>
       <button onClick={this.handlereset}>Reset</button>
     </div>
 )};  
}

Lifting the State Up

Another major concept of React is Lifting the State Up. In React a component cannot pass information straight to its sibling. Instead, the information must travel through a common parent. The process of giving the correct components access to the right information is called lifting state. The props flow vertically down maintaining their local state, while at the same time there are multiple components that can share the same props. Hence maintaining the state both vertically and horizontally across the application gets tough. This is where lifting the state up comes into the picture. Here is a small demo for the same.

import React, { useState } from "react";
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";
import Button from "./Button";
import "./styles.css";

function App() {
  const [counter, setCounter] = useState(0);

  const incrementCounter = () => {
    setCounter(counter + 1);
  };

  return (
    <div className="App">
      <h1>Hello</h1>
      <Button
        counter={counter}
        onClick={() => {
          incrementCounter();
        }}
      >
        Example
      </Button>
    </div>
  );
}

const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);

The component is a Button :

import React from "react";
export default props => {
  return (
    <button onClick={props.onClick}>
      {props.children} clicked {props.counter} time
    </button>
  );
};

For another working demo on lifting state you can check out below link: Lifting State Source Code

Hooks

The above example also covers the concept of “Hooks” in React. Hooks help you in state management without the use of classes. I feel it’s a boon for the beginners who are trying to learn React as it eases down the state management. Hooks are even beneficial in code reusability, creating custom hooks helps us achieve that. But for now, we have plenty of them to explore like "useSate, useEffect, useRedux, useReducer etc".

Let's take examples for a few Hooks to get a better picture.

useState: By importing useState in your code you’re signalling the intent to hold some kind of state inside your React component. And more important, that React component shouldn’t be an ES6 class anymore. It can be a pure and simple JavaScript function. This is the most appealing thing of the hooks story. Here is an example.

import React, {useState} from 'react';

function HooksDemo() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
  return (
    <div>
      Count: {count}
      <button onClick={() => setCount(0)}>Reset</button>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>+</button>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(count - 1)}>-</button>
    </div>
  );
}
export default HooksDemo;

The first value, count in this case, is the current state (like this.state) and the second value setCount is a function used to update the state (first) value. The 0 in useState(0) function is the Initial Value of that particular state.

useEffect: useEffect is similar to componentDidMount and componentDidUpdate of React Lifecycles.

function EffectHook() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

  useEffect(() => {
    document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`;
  });

  return (
    <div>
      <p>You clicked {count} times</p>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>Click me</button>
    </div>
  );
}

whenever you click on the button, the title text will change the number of counts. For example.. You clicked (n) times.

There are many exciting features that React offers us to explore. The topics I covered are some basic concepts that I learned as a beginner. I hope this helps people who are looking for a start.

This article was written by Megha Sachdev who is a Software Engineer at This Dot.

You can follow them on Twitter at @_megsachdev.

This Dot is a consultancy dedicated to guiding companies through their modernization and digital transformation journeys. Specializing in replatforming, modernizing, and launching new initiatives, we stand out by taking true ownership of your engineering projects.

We love helping teams with projects that have missed their deadlines or helping keep your strategic digital initiatives on course. Check out our case studies and our clients that trust us with their engineering.

Communication Between Client Components in Next.js

Communication Between Client Components in Next.js In recent years, Next.js has become one of the most popular React frameworks for building server-rendered applications. With the introduction of the App Router in Next.js 13, the framework has taken a major leap forward by embracing a new approach to building web applications: the concept of server components and client components. This separation of concerns allows developers to strategically decide which parts of their application should be rendered on the server and which are then hydrated in the browser for interactivity. The Challenge: Communicating Between Client Components While server components offer numerous benefits, they also introduce a new challenge: how can client components within different boundaries communicate with each other? For instance, let's consider a scenario where you have a button (a client component) and a separate client component that displays the number of times the button has been clicked. In a regular React application, this would typically be accomplished by lifting the state to a common ancestor component, allowing the button to update the state, which is then passed down to the counter display component. However, the traditional approach may not be as straightforward in a Next.js application that heavily relies on server components, with client components scattered across the page. This blog post will explore three ways to facilitate communication between client components in Next.js, depending on where you want to store the state. Lifting State to a Common Client Component One approach to communicating between client components is to lift the state to a common client component. This could be a React context provider, a state management system like Zustand, or any other solution that allows you to share state across components. The key aspect is that this wrapper component should be higher up in the tree (perhaps even in the layout) and accept server components as children. Next.js allows you to interleave client and server components as much as you want, as long as server components are passed to client components as props or as component children. Here's how this approach might look in practice. First of all, we'd create a wrapper client component that holds the state: ` This wrapper component can be included in the layout: ` Any server components can be rendered within the layout, potentially nesting them several levels deep. Finally, we'd create two client components, one for the button and one for the counter display: ` ` The entire client and server component tree is rendered on the server, and the client components are then hydrated in the browser and initialized. From then on, the communication between the client components works just like in any regular React application. Check out the page using this pattern in the embedded Stackblitz window below: Using Query Params for State Management Another approach is to use query params instead of a wrapper client component and store the state in the URL. In this scenario, you have two client components: the button and the counter display. The counter value (the state) is stored in a query param, such as counterValue. The client components can read the current counter value using the useSearchParams hook. Once read, the useRouter hook can update the query param, effectively updating the counter value. However, there's one gotcha to this approach. If a route is statically rendered, calling useSearchParams will cause the client component tree up to the closest Suspense boundary to be client-side rendered. Next.js recommends wrapping the client component that uses useSearchParams in a boundary. Here's an example of how this approach might look. The button reads the current counter value and updates it on click by using the router's replace function: ` The counter display component is relatively simple, only reading the counter value: ` And here is the page that is a server component, hosting both of the above client components: ` Feel free to check out the above page in the embedded Stackblitz below: Storing State on the Server The third approach is to store the state on the server. In this case, the counter display component accepts the counter value as a prop, where the counter value is passed by a parent server component that reads the counter value from the database. The button component, when clicked, calls a server action that updates the counter value and calls revalidatePath() so that the counter value is refreshed, and consequently, the counter display component is re-rendered. It's worth noting that in this approach, unless you need some interactivity in the counter display component, it doesn't need to be a client component – it can be purely server-rendered. However, if both components need to be client components, here's an example of how this approach might look. First, we'll implement a server action that updates the counter value. We won't get into the mechanics of updating it, which in a real app would require a call to the database or an external API - so we're only commenting that part. After that, we revalidate the path so that the Next.js caches are purged, and the counter value is retrieved again in server components that read it. ` The button is a simple client component that calls the above server action when clicked. ` The counter display component reads the counter value from the parent: ` While the parent is a server component that reads the counter value from the database or an external API. ` This pattern can be seen in the embedded Stackblitz below: Conclusion Next.js is a powerful framework that offers various choices for implementing communication patterns between client components. Whether you lift state to a common client component, use query params for state management, or store the state on the server, Next.js provides all the tools you need to add a communication path between two separate client component boundaries. We hope this blog post has been useful in demonstrating how to facilitate communication between client components in Next.js. Check out other Next.js blog posts we've written for more insights and best practices. You can also view the entire codebase for the above snippets on StackBlitz....

Jun 21, 2024

5 mins

NextJSReact

Why is My React Reducer Called Twice and What the Heck is a Pure Function?

Why is My React Reducer Called Twice and What the Heck is a Pure Function? In a recent project, we encountered an interesting issue: our React reducer was dispatching twice, producing incorrect values, such as incrementing a number in increments of two. We hopped on a pairing session and started debugging. Eventually, we got to the root of the problem and learned the importance of pure functions in functional programming. This article will explain why our reducer was being dispatched twice, what pure functions are, and how React's strict mode helped us identify a bug in our code. The Issue We noticed that our useReducer hook was causing the reducer function to be called twice for every action dispatched. Initially, we were confused about this behavior and thought it might be a bug in React. Additionally, we had one of the dispatches inside a useEffect, which caused it to be called twice due to React strict mode, effectively firing the reducer four times and further complicating our debugging process. However, we knew that React's strict mode caused useEffect to be called twice, so it didn't take very long to realize that the issue was not with React but with how we had implemented our reducer function. React Strict Mode React's strict mode is a tool for highlighting potential problems in an application. It intentionally double-invokes specific lifecycle methods and hooks (like useReducer and useEffect) to help developers identify side effects. This behavior exposed our issue, as we had reducers that were not pure functions. What is a Pure Function? A pure function is a function that: - Is deterministic: Given the same input, always returns the same output. - Does Not Have Side Effects: Does not alter any external state or have observable interactions with the outside world. In the context of a reducer, this means the function should not: - Modify its arguments - Perform any I/O operations (like network requests or logging) - Generate random numbers - Depend on any external state Pure functions are predictable and testable. They help prevent bugs and make code easier to reason about. In the context of React, pure functions are essential for reducers because they ensure that the state transitions are predictable and consistent. The Root Cause: Impure Reducers Our reducers were not pure functions. They were altering external state and had side effects, which caused inconsistent behavior when React's strict mode double-invoked them. This led to unexpected results and made debugging more difficult. The Solution: Make Reducers Pure To resolve this issue, we refactored our reducers to ensure they were pure functions. Here's an extended example of how we transformed an impure reducer into a pure one in a more complex scenario involving a task management application. Let's start with the initial state and action types: ` And here's the impure reducer similar to what we had initially: ` This reducer is impure because it directly modifies the state object, which is a side effect. To make it pure, we must create a new state object for every action and return it without modifying the original state. Here's the refactored pure reducer: ` Key Changes: - Direct State Modification: In the impure reducer, the state is directly modified (e.g., state.tasks.push(action.payload)). This causes side effects and violates the principles of pure functions. - Side Effects: The impure reducer included side effects such as logging and direct state changes. The pure reducer eliminates these side effects, ensuring consistent and predictable behavior. I've created an interactive example to demonstrate the difference between impure and pure reducers in a React application. Despite the RESET_TASKS action being implemented similarly in both reducers, you'll notice that the impure reducer does not reset the tasks correctly. This problem happens because the impure reducer directly modifies the state, leading to unexpected behavior. Check out the embedded StackBlitz example below: Conclusion Our experience with the reducer dispatching twice was a valuable lesson in the importance of pure functions in React. Thanks to React's strict mode, we identified and fixed impure reducers, leading to more predictable and maintainable code. If you encounter similar issues, ensure your reducers are pure functions and leverage React strict mode to catch potential problems early in development. By embracing functional programming principles, you can write cleaner, more reliable code that is easier to debug and maintain....

Jun 14, 2024

3 mins

React

Introduction to Zod for Data Validation

As web developers, we're often working with data from external sources like APIs we don't control or user inputs submitted to our backends. We can't always rely on this data to take the form we expect, and we can encounter unexpected errors when it deviates from expectations. But with the Zod library, we can define what our data ought to look like and parse the incoming data against those defined schemas. This lets us work with that data confidently, or to quickly throw an error when it isn't correct. Why use Zod? TypeScript is great for letting us define the shape of our data in our code. It helps us write more correct code the first time around by warning us if we are doing something we shouldn't. But TypeScript can't do everything for us. For example, we can define a variable as a string or a number, but we can't say "a string that starts with user_id_ and is 20 characters long" or "an integer between 1 and 5". There are limits to how much TypeScript can narrow down our data for us. Also, TypeScript is a tool for us developers. When we compile our code, our types are not available to the vanilla JavaScript. JavaScript can't validate that the data we actually use in our code matches what we thought we'd get when we wrote our TypeScript types unless you're willing to manually write code to perform those checks. This is where we can reach for a tool like Zod. With Zod, we can write data schemas. These schemas, in the simplest scenarios, look very much like TypeScript types. But we can do more with Zod than we can with TypeScript alone. Zod schemas let us create additional rules for data parsing and validation. A 20-character string that starts with user_id_? It's z.string().startsWith('user_id_').length(20). An integer between 1 and 5 inclusive? It's z.number().int().gte(1).lte(5). Zod's primitives give us many extra functions to be more specific about *exactly* what data we expect. Unlike TypeScript, Zod schemas aren't removed on compilation to JavaScript—we still have access to them! If our app receives some data, we can verify that it matches the expected shape by passing it to your Zod schema's parse function. You'll either get back your data in exactly the shape you defined in your schema, or Zod will give you an error to tell you what was wrong. Zod schemas aren't a replacement for TypeScript; rather, they are an excellent complement. Once we've defined our Zod schema, it's simple to derive a TypeScript type from it and to use that type as we normally would. But when we really need to be sure our data conforms to the schema, we can always parse the data with our schema for that extra confidence. Defining Data Schemas Zod schemas are the variables that define our expectations for the shape of our data, validate those expectations, and transform the data if necessary to match our desired shape. It's easy to start with simple schemas, and to add complexity as required. Zod provides different functions that represent data structures and related validation options, which can be combined to create larger schemas. In many cases, you'll probably be building a schema for a data object with properties of some primitive type. For example, here's a schema that would validate a JavaScript object representing an order for a pizza: ` Zod provides a number of primitives for defining schemas that line up with JavaScript primitives: string, number, bigint, boolean, date, symbol, undefined, and null. It also includes primitives void, any, unknown, and never for additional typing information. In addition to basic primitives, Zod can define object, array, and other native data structure schemas, as well as schemas for data structures not natively part of JavaScript like tuple and enum. The documentation contains considerable detail on the available data structures and how to use them. Parsing and Validating Data with Schemas With Zod schemas, you're not only telling your program what data should look like; you're also creating the tools to easily verify that the incoming data matches the schema definitions. This is where Zod really shines, as it greatly simplifies the process of validating data like user inputs or third party API responses. Let's say you're writing a website form to register new users. At a minimum, you'll need to make sure the new user's email address is a valid email address. For a password, we'll ask for something at least 8 characters long and including one letter, one number, and one special character. (Yes, this is not really the best way to write strong passwords; but for the sake of showing off how Zod works, we're going with it.) We'll also ask the user to confirm their password by typing it twice. First, let's create a Zod schema to model these inputs: ` So far, this schema is pretty basic. It's only making sure that whatever the user types as an email is an email, and it's checking that the password is at least 8 characters long. But it is *not* checking if password and confirmPassword match, nor checking for the complexity requirements. Let's enhance our schema to fix that! ` By adding refine with a custom validation function, we have been able to verify that the passwords match. If they don't, parsing will give us an error to let us know that the data was invalid. We can also chain refine functions to add checks for our password complexity rules: ` Here we've chained multiple refine functions. You could alternatively use superRefine, which gives you even more fine grained control. Now that we've built out our schema and added refinements for extra validation, we can parse some user inputs. Let's see two test cases: one that's bound to fail, and one that will succeed. ` There are two main ways we can use our schema to validate our data: parse and safeParse. The main difference is that parse will throw an error if validation fails, while safeParse will return an object with a success property of either true or false, and either a data property with your parsed data or an error property with the details of a ZodError explaining why the parsing failed. In the case of our example data, userInput2 will parse just fine and return the data for you to use. But userInput1 will create a ZodError listing all of the ways it has failed validation. ` ` We can use these error messages to communicate to the user how they need to fix their form inputs if validation fails. Each error in the list describes the validation failure and gives us a human readable message to go with it. You'll notice that the validation errors for checking for a valid email and for checking password length have a lot of details, but we've got three items at the end of the error list that don't really tell us anything useful: just a custom error of Invalid input. The first is from our refine checking if the passwords match, and the second two are from our refine functions checking for password complexity (numbers and special characters). Let's modify our refine functions so that these errors are useful! We'll add our own error parameters to customize the message we get back and the path to the data that failed validation. ` Now, our error messages from failures in refine are informative! You can figure out which form fields aren't validating from the path, and then display the messages next to form fields to let the user know how to remedy the error. ` By giving our refine checks a custom path and message, we can make better use of the returned errors. In this case, we can highlight specific problem form fields for the user and give them the message about what is wrong. Integrating with TypeScript Integrating Zod with TypeScript is very easy. Using z.infer<typeof YourSchema> will allow you to avoid writing extra TypeScript types that merely reflect the intent of your Zod schemas. You can create a type from any Zod schema like so: ` Using a TypeScript type derived from a Zod schema does *not* give you any extra level of data validation at the type level beyond what TypeScript is capable of. If you create a type from z.string.min(3).max(20), the TypeScript type will still just be string. And when compiled to JavaScript, even that will be gone! That's why you still need to use parse/safeParse on incoming data to validate it before proceeding as if it really does match your requirements. A common pattern with inferring types from Zod schemas is to use the same name for both. Because the schema is a variable, there's no name conflict if the type uses the same name. However, I find that this can lead to confusing situations when trying to import one or the other—my personal preference is to name the Zod schema with Schema at the end to make it clear which is which. Conclusion Zod is an excellent tool for easily and confidently asserting that the data you're working with is exactly the sort of data you were expecting. It gives us the ability to assert at runtime that we've got what we wanted, and allows us to then craft strategies to handle what happens if that data is wrong. Combined with the ability to infer TypeScript types from Zod schemas, it lets us write and run more reliable code with greater confidence....

Nov 15, 2024

7 mins

JavaScriptZod

Understanding the Difference Between `:focus` and `:focus-visible` in CSS

Understanding the Difference Between :focus and :focus-visible in CSS I have learned my fair share about the importance of keyboard accessibility, so I know that visual indication of the focused element is very important. But the well-known :focus pseudo-class is not always the best fit for this job. That's where :focus-visible comes in. Let's look at the differences between these two pseudo-classes and explore the best practices for using them effectively. What is the :focus Pseudo-Class? The :focus pseudo-class is a CSS selector that applies styles to any element that receives focus, regardless of how that focus was triggered. This includes focus events from keyboard navigation, mouse clicks, and touch interactions. Example Usage of :focus ` In this example, the button will display a blue outline whenever it is focused, whether the user clicks on it with a mouse, taps it on a touchscreen, or navigates to it using the keyboard. What is the :focus-visible Pseudo-Class? The :focus-visible pseudo-class is more specialized. It only applies styles to an element when the browser determines that the focus should be visible. This typically occurs when the user navigates via the keyboard or assistive technologies rather than through mouse or touch input. Example Usage of :focus-visible ` Here, the button will only show a blue outline when focused through keyboard navigation or another input method that usually requires visible focus indicators. Key Differences Between :focus and :focus-visible :focus - Behavior: Applies to any element that receives focus, regardless of the input method. - Use Cases: Ensures that all interactions with the element are visually indicated, whether by mouse, keyboard, or touch. :focus-visible - Behavior: Applies styles only when the focus should be visible, such as using a keyboard or assistive technology. - Use Cases: Ideal for scenarios where you want to provide focus indicators only to keyboard and assistive technology users while avoiding unnecessary outlines for mouse and touch users, typically required by design. Accessibility Implications :focus - Pros: - Guarantees that all users can see when an element is focused, which is critical for accessibility. - Cons: - Can lead to a suboptimal experience for mouse users, as focus styles may appear unnecessarily during mouse interactions. :focus-visible - Pros: - Enhances user experience by showing focus indicators only when necessary, thus keeping the interface clean for mouse and touch users. - Tailors the experience for keyboard and assistive technology users, providing them with clear visual cues. - Cons: - Additional considerations may be required to ensure that focus indicators are not accidentally omitted, especially in older browsers that do not support :focus-visible. - There may be cases where you want to show focus indicators for all users, regardless of input method. Best Practices for Using :focus and :focus-visible To achieve the best accessibility and user experience, combining both :focus and :focus-visible in your CSS is often a good idea. Combining :focus and :focus-visible ` Here is a Stackblitz example of what such styling could look like for you to try out and play with. Additional Tips - Test with Keyboard and Assistive Technology: Ensure that your web application is navigable using a keyboard (Tab, Shift + Tab, etc.) and that focus indicators are visible for those who rely on them. It's never a bad idea to include accessibility testing in your e2e testing suite. - Provide Clear Focus Indicators: Make sure that focus indicators are prominent and easy to see. A subtle or hard-to-spot focus indicator can severely impact accessibility for users who rely on keyboard navigation. Conclusion The :focus-visible pseudo-class offers a more refined way to manage focus indicators, improving accessibility and user experience, particularly for keyboard and assistive technology users. By understanding the differences between :focus and :focus-visible, and applying best practices in your CSS, you can create more accessible and user-friendly web applications. Remember, accessibility should never be an afterthought. By thoughtfully applying focus styles, you ensure that all users, regardless of how they interact with your site, can easily navigate and interact....

Nov 8, 2024

3 mins

AccessibilityCSSPlaywright

Let's innovate together!

We're ready to be your trusted technical partners in your digital innovation journey.

Whether it's modernization or custom software solutions, our team of experts can guide you through best practices and how to build scalable, performant software that lasts.

My first steps towards learning React

Basics of React

React for beginners

Components, Props and State

Lifting the State Up

Hooks

You might also like

Communication Between Client Components in Next.js

Why is My React Reducer Called Twice and What the Heck is a Pure Function?

Introduction to Zod for Data Validation

Understanding the Difference Between `:focus` and `:focus-visible` in CSS

Let's innovate together!

You might also like

Communication Between Client Components in Next.js

Why is My React Reducer Called Twice and What the Heck is a Pure Function?

Introduction to Zod for Data Validation

Understanding the Difference Between `:focus` and `:focus-visible` in CSS